NFL v. Flores, Election Interference & Vindman’s Lawsuit

February 5, 2022

In This Episode:

The #SistersInLaw meet this week to explain the NFL vs Flores case, the ‘but for’ requirement in discrimination cases, and to emphasize the value of diversity across all levels of an organization.  Then, they look at the latest developments in holding Donald accountable for his attempts to interfere in the 2020 election, and Alexander Vindman’s lawsuit against members of his team.

Read this week’s transcript.


Get #SistersInLaw Merch

For our just released ethically sourced clothes, pins and more, support the #SistersInLaw by picking up our new merch items at the Politicon Merch Store.

#Sisters Show Off Their Merch


Email the sisters at SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or tweet using #SistersInLaw.


Content Recommended By The #Sisters

From Kim: On President Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court

From Barb: On why it’s not racist to commit to nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court

Mentioned by Jill: Jonathan Greenblatt discusses Whoopi’s holocaust comments on the view

David Baddiel on the Whoopi controversy


Links To This Week’s Sponsors

Hello Fresh: For up to 16 free meals and 3 free gifts, go to hellofresh.com and use the promo code: SISTERS16

Frame Bridge: For 15% off your first order, go to framebridge.com and use the promo code: SISTERS

Magic Spoon: For $5 off your next purchase of delicious Magic Spoon cereal, go to magicspoon.com and use the promo code: SISTER

Blinkist: For a 7 day free trial and 25% off a premium membership go to blinkist.com


Get More From The #Sisters In Law

Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC

Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President

Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR

Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC

Site by ICON
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions